Legal Opinion

Penberthy v. Vahl

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 7, 1950No. Civ. No. 14558PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtNotjrse, P. J.

Plaintiff, a real estate broker, brought an action for damages in the amount of $6,250 for an alleged breach of contract by defendant of an exclusive right to sell. The cause was tried without a jury, judgment going for defendant, the trial court finding that defendant had not dealt with her property in such a manner as to prevent the performance of the contract or to make performance impossible, and that she was ready, willing and able to transfer the property under the terms of the contract if plaintiff had obtained a purchaser.

The facts of the ease are that on February 18, 1947, appellant…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Gammon v. Ealey & ThompsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  2. Rucker v. HallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Carlson v. Idustrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Lowe v. LoydCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  5. Wright v. VernonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Motif Records Corp. v. BrummerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API