Legal Opinion

People v. Jackson

New York Court of Appeals

Decided October 8, 1987PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

Defendant’s primary argument in this court is that her conviction must be reversed because she was denied effective assistance of counsel during the trial. After examining the record and viewing the evidence, law and circumstances of the case in totality, we conclude defendant’s allegations of counsel’s ineffectiveness are not supported by the record and she was not denied meaningful representation (see, People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137, 146-147).

We concur with the Appellate Division’s disposition of defendant’s…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People v. BaldiNew York Court of Appeals · 1981

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. In re Nicole V.New York Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. People v. BaltesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  3. People v. HayesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  4. People v. PinchbackNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. People v. RichardsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API