Dawson v. East Carolina Railway
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtStacy, J.
This action is to recover damages for tbe loss of one bale of cotton 'and for delay in ’shipping and delivering nine others.
On 22 November, 1919, J. T. Winstead, one of tbe plaintiffs, shipped to Holmes & Dawson at Norfolk, Ya., nine bales of cotton, delivering *60same to defendant, East Carolina Railway, at Macclesfield, N. C., and taking therefor a through bill of lading containing the following stipulation :
“Claims for loss, damage or delay must be made in writing to the carrier at the point of delivery or at the point of origin within four months after delivery of the property, or, in case…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Adams Express Company v. CroningerSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Georgia, Florida & Alabama Railway Co. v. Blish Milling Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. HarrimanSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co. v. WallaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. LeatherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. Seaboard Air Line Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1927
- Davis v. John L. Roper Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1924