Missouri-Pacific R. v. Sorrell
District Court, W.D. Texas
1Opinion of the Court
McMILLAN, District Judge.
In this case, plaintiffs sue defendant for a balance of freight charges alleged to be due upon a refused interstate shipment.
The facts with regard to the actual shipment, the refusal at destination by the diversion consignee, the forced sale, deficiency in amount, and the freight charges now due by some one, are not only undisputed but stipulated.
Defendant defends upon the ground that he was not the owner of the shipment, but simply the agent for the owner; that the true owner was disclosed to plaintiffs’ agent; and that an oral agreement existed' between defendant…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Central Iron & Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Houston & T. C. R. v. Lee County Produce Co.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1926
- Chicago, Indianapolis & Louisville Railway Co. v. PetersonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1918
- Wells, Fargo & Company's Express v. FullerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1893
- St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co. v. Republic Box Co.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1926
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- East Texas Motor Freight Lines v. Franklin County Distilling Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1944
- Graves v. Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1942