Legal Opinion

King v. Summitt

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1881No. 7577PublishedCited by 8 opinions

From the Monroe Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Best, C.

— This suit was brought by the appellant against the appellees. His complaint consisted of two paragraphs. In the first he alleged that one James Hayden, on the 16th day of July, 1875, made his note to the appellees for $125, and that they endorsed it to him ; that at the time said Hayden made said note he was a minor, and was not liable to pay it; that the appellant, in ignorance of that fact, brought suit upon said note against said Hayden, and by reason thereof said suit was unavailing.

*313In the amended second he alleged that on the 16th day of July, 1875, one James Hayden made his…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Bernard J. Lee, Platiff-Appellant v. Jenkins Brothers, Bernard J. Lee v. Farnham YardleyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
  2. Burkam v. BurkIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Voris v. Star City Building & Loan Ass'nIndiana Court of Appeals · 1898
  4. Webster v. KowalMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
  5. Smith v. CoregeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1890

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API