Legal Opinion
Republic Metalware Co. v. General Reinsurance Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 26, 1935PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSears, P. J.
The part of the judgment from which the plaintiff has appealed rests on a construction favorable to the defendant of certain clauses of a contract between the parties. The contract is in terms one of reinsurance between the plaintiff, which is recited in the contract to be a duly qualified self-insurer authorized under the Illinois and New York Workmen’s Compensation Acts to pay compensation direct, called.in the contract the “Company,” and the defendant, called in the contract the “ Reinsurer.” The clauses which we must construe are as follows:
“ Section I. The Reinsurer hereby reinsures the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Allemannia Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh v. Firemen's Ins. Co. of Baltimore Ex Rel. WolfeSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- The Mutual Safety Ins. Co. v. . HoneNew York Court of Appeals · 1849
- Jacobus v. . Jamestown Mantel Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1914
- Jackson v. . St. Paul Fire and Marine Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1885
- Insurance of Pennsylvania v. Park & Pollard Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In re the Construction of the Will of LawlessNew York Surrogate's Court · 1949
- In re the Intermediate Accounting of State Street Bank & Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1965
- Mercantile & General Reinsurance Co. v. Spanno Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1991
- Republic Metalware Co. v. General Reinsurance Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935