Legal Opinion

Doe v. State Ex Rel. Governor's Organized Crime Prevention Commission

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided March 18, 1992No. 20040PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FRANCHINI, Justice.

This appeal addresses a limitation on the subpoena power of the Governor’s Organized Crime Prevention Commission (Commission), as set out in the Organized Crime Act, NMSA 1978, §§ 29-9-1 to' -18 (Repl.Pamp.1990) (Act). Specifically, we examine whether a corporation or a representative acting on its behalf can refuse to testify or produce evidence to the Commission on the ground that either the corporation or its representative will be exposed to criminal prosecution or forfeiture and thereby be eligible for statutory immunity pursuant to Section 29-9-9. We hold that…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Hale v. HenkelSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  2. Braswell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Methola v. County of EddyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Buzbee v. DonnellyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Quintana v. New Mexico Department of CorrectionsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1983

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. NICK R.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2009
  2. State v. YarboroughNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State v. JacksonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2010
  4. State v. JacksonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Bybee v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1995

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API