Legal Opinion

Gall v. Robertson

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 7, 1960PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.

It is fortuitous that this proceeding is had in a Wisconsin court. Evidently service could be made here on the defendants in the action for wrongful death. The distribution of the money recovered in the action must be governed by the law of Illinois, except in so far as it is proper for sec. 102.29 (1), Wis. Stats., hereinafter referred to as the Wisconsin reimbursement provision, to operate. The question presented is the proper extent of such operation.

Secs. 1 and 2, ch. 70, 1 Illinois Rev. Stats. 1953, create a cause of action for wrongful death, authorize the personal representative of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Baker & Conrad, Inc. v. Chicago Heights Construction Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Eleason v. Western Casualty & Surety Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Breitwieser v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Anderson v. Miller Scrap Iron Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1922
  5. In re BurkeNew York Surrogate's Court · 1948

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Diedrick v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Byers v. North Carolina State Highway CommissionCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969
  3. Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Western Casualty & Surety Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API