Jamie Elward v. Sealy, Inc.

1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA 7 JAMIE ELWARD, CASE NO. C22-5645 BHS 8 Plaintiff, ORDER 9 v. 10 SEALY, INC., 11 Defendant. 12 13 THIS MATTER is before the Court on plaintiff Jamie Elward’s motion for 14 attorneys’ fees, Dkt. 116, and on defendant Sealy Inc.’s renewed motion for judgment as 15 a matter of law, or for a new trial, amendment of the judgment, or remittitur, Dkt. 132. 16 Elward prevailed on her quid pro quo and her hostile work environment WLAD 17 claims against Sealy. The jury rejected Sealy’s Faragher-Ellerth affirmative defense…