Legal Opinion
Stephen P. Kupiec and John E. Cihocki v. Republic Federal Savings and Loan Association and Otto C. Martinek
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided March 4, 1975No. 74-1835PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PELL, Circuit Judge.
The issue presented in this appeal is whether the Federal Home Loan Bank Board’s Bylaw (g), as set forth in Regulation 544.6(g), 12 C.F.R. § 544.6(g), when adopted by a federal savings and loan association, is the sole and exclusive means of communication between members of the association, 1 and, if so, whether the bylaw is unreasonable or infringes on the constitutional rights of the members.
The plaintiffs, Stephen Kupiec and John Cihocki, are members of the defendant Republic Federal Savings and Loan Association (Republic) by reason of being holders of savings accounts…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- United States v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Kleindienst v. MandelSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Illinois v. City of MilwaukeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Breard v. AlexandriaSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Fidelity Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. De La CuestaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Rettig v. Arlington Heights Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1975
- First Federal Savings and Loan Association of Boston v. Carol S. Greenwald, Etc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1979
- Tamari v. Bache & Co. Lebanon)Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977
- Glendale Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. FoxDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1978
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.