Legal Opinion

Young v. Williamson

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 16, 1964No. 4684PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant, who in 1963 instituted this action against appellee-attorneys for damages occasioned by an omission in a title •opinion prepared by appellees ten years •earlier, appeals a judgment on the pleadings based upon appellees’ defense of the •statute of limitations. While it is not ■clear from the record here whether appel-lees relied upon the limitation embodied in Fla.Stat. 95.11(4), F.S.A., or upon the arguably applicable limitation in Fla.Stat. 95.-11(5) (e), F.S.A., it is clear that the facts alleged do not, contrary to appellant’s argument, bring the cause within the limitation of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Tuggle v. MaddoxSupreme Court of Florida · 1952
  2. Proctor v. SchombergSupreme Court of Florida · 1953
  3. Punta Gorda Bank v. State BankSupreme Court of Florida · 1906
  4. Courtlandt Corp. v. WhitmerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1960

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Glass v. CamaraDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
  2. A & G Aircraft Service, Inc. v. JohnsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
  3. Richardson v. WilsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
  4. Suckle v. Cincinnati Insurance Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API