Legal Opinion

Payne v. Foster

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided May 27, 1946No. 18311PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

This is a suit for $150, the alleged balance due on the purchase price of a certain automobile. Zora Payne, the plaintiff, a blind woman, sues as the attorney-in-fact of Virginia Agobert. She alleges that acting for her principal she sold to the defendant, George Foster, a Ford automobile for $450, $300 of which he paid in cash.

The defendant claims that the automobile was sold to him for $300, which he paid in currency and that there is no further amount due plaintiff.

There was judgment below in plaintiff's favor in the sum of $150 and defendant has appealed.

Virginia Agobert moved from the…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Mid-South Contractors, Inc. v. RatcliffLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API