Schwartz v. Frieder
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Per curiam
The order and judgment appealed from were granted because the second defense pleaded was deemed sufficient. It is to the effect that the services rendered by the plaintiff were of such a character as to require him to be possessed of a real estate brokerage license. (Real Prop. Law, § 440-a.) The view thus *200adopted was erroneous. The complaint and papers submitted in opposition to defendants’ motion present an issue as to whether the services were not those of a business broker rather than a real estate broker, within the rule of Weingast v. Rialto Pastry Shop, Inc. (243 N. Y. 113).
It follows,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Weingast v. Rialto Pastry Shop, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1926
3Cited by2 opinions
- Dodge v. RichmondAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1958
- Bishop Estates, Inc. v. MurphyNassau County District Court · 1964