Legal Opinion

Ceballos v. Munson Steamship Line

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1903Published

Motion for a nonsuit reserved until after the rendition of a verdict hy the jury, pursuant to section 1187 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

1Opinion of the CourtRogers, J.

• The action is brought to recover commissions on freights, alleged to have been contracted to be paid to the plaintiffs’ predecessor, Juan M. Oehallos, -with the defendant’s predecessor, W. D. Munson, in shipping cattle from divers ports of ETorth and South America to the island of Cuba.

The allegations of the complaint, as to the agreement, are: “ That on or about the 11th day of October, 1887, the said Juan M. Oeballos * * * duly made and entered into an agreement with the said W. D. Munson, as follows: The said W. D. Munson thereby promised and agreed to pay to the said J. M. Oehallos &…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sibbald v. . the Bethlehem Iron CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  2. Simson v. . BrownNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  3. Griggs v. . DayNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  4. White v. DanielsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
  5. Gilbert v. QuinlanNew York Supreme Court · 1891

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API