Legal Opinion

Linko v. Cleveland-Cliffs Iron Co.

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided November 1, 1949No. Civ. No. 26585PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JONES, Chief Judge.

This is an action based on an injury to plaintiff seaman allegedly caused by defendant’s negligence.

Plaintiff has served nine interrogatories on defendant. Defendant objects to interrogatory No. 4 which asks that copies of certain statements be attached to the answer. Defendant claims that documents cannot be discovered and produced under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, rule 33, 28 U.S.C.A., and that if they can, plaintiff has not shown good cause for their discovery.

It is sufficient to say that documents may not be discovered by the procedure provided in Rule 33. Rule 34…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Burger Man, Inc. v. Jordan Paper Products, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. Foundry Equipment Co. v. Carl-Mayer Corp.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1950
  3. Britting v. Pennsylvania Greyhound Lines, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API