Legal Opinion

Seaboard Air Line Ry. Co. v. Railroad Commission

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Middle Alabama

Decided July 14, 1907PublishedCited by 8 opinions

In Equity. The Seaboard Air Line Railway, the Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Company, the Kansas City, Memphis & Birmingham Railroad Company, the Southern Railway Company, Central of Georgia Railway Company, the Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway Company, the Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company, all foreign corporations, the Western Railway of Alabama, the Alabama Great Southern Railroad Company, the Mobile & Ohio Railroad Company, the Atlanta & Birmingham Air Line…

Read the full summary

In Equity. The Seaboard Air Line Railway, the Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Company, the Kansas City, Memphis & Birmingham Railroad Company, the Southern Railway Company, Central of Georgia Railway Company, the Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway Company, the Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company, all foreign corporations, the Western Railway of Alabama, the Alabama Great Southern Railroad Company, the Mobile & Ohio Railroad Company, the Atlanta & Birmingham Air Line Railway Company, and the South & North Alabama Railroad Company, domestic corporations, operating railroads in this…

1Opinion of the Court

JONES, District Judge.

These preliminary injunctions concern matters of vast public moment. The court had no opportunity at the time they were granted to file an opinion, and does so now. Clearly, if the act of March 6, 3907, which, upon the institution of these suits, ipso facto forfeits the right of complainants to do intrastate business, can be upheld, there is no equity in complainants’ bills, except as to antecedent transactions in domestic commerce. After the taking effect of the statute, if it be constitutional, complainants would have no right to enjoin the enforcement of rates in…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Osborn v. Bank of United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
  2. Smyth v. AmesSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  3. Cummings v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  4. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fé Railway Co. v. EllisSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  5. Smyth v. Ames; Smyth v. Smith; Smyth v. HigginsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1898

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Spring Valley Water Co. v. City & County of San FranciscoU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern California · 1908
  2. Central of Georgia Ry. Co. v. Railroad Commission of AlabamaDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1908
  3. Louisville & N. R. Co. v. Railroad CommissionU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Middle Alabama · 1907
  4. State v. St. Paul City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
  5. Village of Tupper Lake v. MaltbieAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API