Bogle v. Gordon
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Allen District Court. Action by Cordon against Bogle, to recover money. Trial at tbe March term, 1886, and judgment for the plaintiff for $97.50 and costs. The defendant brings the case to this court. The opinion states the facts.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Holt, C.:
On February 20,1883, A. C. Bogle and J. C. Gordon, two young attorneys at Iola, Kansas, formed a copartnership, which was dissolved by mutual consent in October of the same year. At the time of the dissolution, two cases against the St. Louis, Ft. Scott & Wichita Railroad Company, for damages, were undisposed of; all other business of the firm w’as settled. A. C. Bogle afterward obtained fees to the amount of $200 for services in these cases, and then left Kansas for Mississippi. J. C. Gordon brought this action to recover one-half of the amount of the fees collected, and…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Raper v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1887
- Gillespie v. ThomasSupreme Court of Kansas · 1879
- Whereatt v. EllisWisconsin Supreme Court · 1883
3Cited by10 opinions
- Mulhall v. MulhallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1895
- McCulloch v. Davenport Savings BankDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 1915
- Snider v. WindsorSupreme Court of Kansas · 1908
- Armstrong v. LoughSupreme Court of Kansas · 1929
- Dye v. Denver & Rio Grande RailroadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.