Legal Opinion

Ross v. Rainwater

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided January 11, 1926No. 11895Published

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Cothran.

Action against S. E. Crider, Lilly W. Crider, and I. S. Rainwater upon a note by S. E. Crider, maker, and Lilly W. Crider and I. S. Rainwater, indorsers, for $1,000, dated January 11, 1922, due January 11, 1923, payable to the plaintiff, Ann P. Ross, or order, with interest after maturity at 8 per cent, per annum, payable annually, with 10 per cent, attorney’s fees.

The defendant, S. E. Crider, made default in answering, and judgment was taken against him; the defendant, Tilly W. Crider, defendant upon the ground that notice of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Rylee v. Marett, SheriffSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1922
  2. Galbraith v. ShepardWashington Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Hastings v. GrumpWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1921
  4. McCrae v. SpiresSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1922
  5. Rainwater v. CriderSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API