Legal Opinion

Perrigo v. Dowdall

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1881Published

Appeal from a.n order made at the Onondaga Special Term, denying the plaintiff’s motion to charge Thomas Dowdall with the costs of this action.

1Opinion of the Court

Smith, P. J.:

The evidence is convincing that Thomas Dowdall conducted the defense of this action on his own account, the defendant on the record being his mother and his tenant. The action was for trespass on the plaintiff’s land, and one of the defenses set up was that the locus in quo was owned by Thomas Dowdall and he was entitled to the possession of it, and the acts constituting the alleged trespass were done by his direction. It is understood that the motion to charge Dowdall with the costs of the defense was denied on the ground that such a practice prevails only in actions of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Jackson, ex dem. v. Van AntwerpNew York Supreme Court · 1828
  2. The Farmers' Loan and Trust Co. v. . KurschNew York Court of Appeals · 1851

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API