Lloyd v. Thurman
Missouri Court of Appeals
Appeal from the Macon Circuit Court. — Hon. Andrew Ellison, Judge. Section 2253 of the Revised Statutes of 1889 provides that “in lieu of such (whole) transcript, a certified copy of the record entry of the judgment together with the order granting the appeal” may be filed, and then printed abstracts of the entire record may be filed in such time as the rules of the appellate court may prescribe.
Read the full summary
Appeal from the Macon Circuit Court. — Hon. Andrew Ellison, Judge. Section 2253 of the Revised Statutes of 1889 provides that “in lieu of such (whole) transcript, a certified copy of the record entry of the judgment together with the order granting the appeal” may be filed, and then printed abstracts of the entire record may be filed in such time as the rules of the appellate court may prescribe. Rule 15 of this court requires that such abstracts be filed on or before the next preceding day on which the cause is docketed for hearing. Now, said section 2253 and said rule 15 have been complied…
1Opinion of the CourtGill, J.
This is a proceeding, instituted under sections 74 and following, Revised Statutes, 1889, to discover concealed assets belonging to the estate of M. M. Thurman, deceased. The case originated in the *147probate court of Shelby county, whence it was taken by appeal to the Shelby circuit court and thence; by change of venue, to the Macon court. There have been several trials attended with varied fortune to either party, but at last resulted in a dismissal by the Macon circuit court on a motion filed by the defendant.
Appellate Practice: bill or exceptions: motions. On account' of a failure to…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Nichols v. StevensSupreme Court of Missouri · 1894
- State v. GriffinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1889
- Jefferson City v. OpelSupreme Court of Missouri · 1878
- United States v. Gamble & BatesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1847
- State v. ShehaneSupreme Court of Missouri · 1857
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Reitz v. PattonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1898