Legal Opinion

In Re Election Contest as to Watertown

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 23, 2001No. NonePublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

628 N.W.2d 336 (2001)

2001 SD 62

In the Matter of the ELECTION CONTEST AS TO WATERTOWN SPECIAL REFERENDUM ELECTION OF OCTOBER 26, 1999 Pertaining To Referred Ballot Issues No. 1 and 2.

No. 21595.

Supreme Court of South Dakota.

Argued April 24, 2001.

Decided May 23, 2001.

Robert L. Spears, Watertown, SD, Attorney for appellants Porisch, Andrea, and Fischer.

Thomas J. Linngren of Green, Schulz, Roby, Oviatt, Cummings & Linngren, Watertown, SD, Attorneys for appellee Prairie Lakes Hospital, Sioux Valley Health Care and Bartron Clinic.

Roy A. Wise of Richardson, Groseclose, Wyly, Wise & Sauck, Aberdeen,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Larson v. LockenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Ury v. SanteeDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1969
  3. Buonanno v. DiStefanoSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1981
  4. Green v. Independent Consolidated School District No. 1Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
  5. Becker v. PfeiferSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. THOM & MILLER v. BARNETT/ELECTION CONTEST AS TO AMENDMENT ASouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021
  2. Heinemeyer v. Heartland Consumers Power DistrictSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Heinemeyer v. Heartland Consumers Power DistrictSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API