Legal Opinion

WILSON v. IMPACKT TEN LLC

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided September 15, 2025No. 3:24-cv-01624Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA DAKOTA WILSON, Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:24-CV-01624 v. (MEHALCHICK, J.) IMPACKT TEN, LLC, ET AL., Defendants. MEMORANDUM Before the Court is Plaintiff Dakota Wilson’s (“Wilson”) motion for leave to file a first amended complaint. (Doc. 31). This action arises from a September 20, 2023, incident, in which a conveyer pulled in and crushed Wilson’s right hand. (Doc. 3, at 7). On August 1, 2024, Wilson filed a complaint in the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County against Impackt Ten LLC (“Impackt Ten”), AAA Hazelton, LLC…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. In Re Burlington Coat Factory Securities Litigation. P. Gregory Buchanan, Jacob Turner and Ronald AbramoffCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
  3. Glassman v. Computervision Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
  4. Edward Arthur v. Maersk, Inc. D/B/A Maersk Line Ltd. Dyn Corp. Technical Services D/B/A Dyn Marine Services the United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
  5. 6 O.S.H. Cas.(bna) 1436, 1978 O.S.H.D. (Cch) P 22,646 Cornell and Company, Inc. v. Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission and Secretary of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API