Legal Opinion

Heywood v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 16, 1913No. 4711PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Accusation of carrying concealed weapon; from city court of "Bainbridge—Judge Spooner. February 8, 1913.

1Opinion of the CourtPottle, J.

1. Where a segregation of the witnesses has been demanded by the accused, it is within the discretion of the trial judge to permit the prosecutor to be first sworn, and thereafter to remain in court for the purpose of assisting the solicitor.

2. Testimony that the witness was present and had as good opportunity to see the transaction as others who were present, and that no such transaction took place, because he did not see it, when he would have seen it if it had taken place, is positive testimony. Testimony that the witness was present and did not see the transaction is merely negative.…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Progressive Life Ins. Co. v. ArcherCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1946
  2. Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1919
  3. Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API