Legal Opinion · Dissent

Frankiewicz v. National Comp Associates

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided July 9, 1981No. 20761Published

1DissentAkin, Justice

I cannot agree that the restrictive covenant here is not in restraint of trade merely because the employer has not sought an injunction to prevent competition. Neither can I agree that an unenforceable covenant not to compete may be used to deny vested renewal commissions provided for in the contract. In my view, the covenant not to compete is either enforceable for all purposes or unenforceable for all purposes if it is in restraint of trade. Because the covenant in question is overly broad and thus unenforceable as an unwarranted restraint of trade, as a matter of law, Justin Belt Co., Inc.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Weatherford Oil Tool Company v. CampbellTexas Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Justin Belt Co., Inc. v. YostTexas Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Johnson v. Country Life InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1973
  4. Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co. v. SharpCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1979
  5. Stancliff v. Southland Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1943

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API