Legal Opinion

Polo Ralph Lauren Corp. v. Chinatown Gift Shop

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided June 21, 1994No. 93 Civ. 6783 (TPG)PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GRIESA, Chief Judge.

In September 1993, plaintiffs, Polo Ralph Lauren Corporation, Rolex Watch U.S.A., Inc., and Louis Vuitton, filed this action alleging trademark infringement, false designation of origin, unfair competition and contributory infringement. Plaintiffs sued three “retailer defendants,” Wen Hao Tang, Dao Mau, and Siu Wong Cheng, for selling infringing goods. Plaintiffs also sued four “landlord defendants,” Jolania Properties, Inc., Melvin Rauch, Charles Rauch and Tenn Sun Realty Corporation, who leased premises to the retailer defendants.

Jolania now moves, pursuant to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Inwood Laboratories, Inc. v. Ives Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Friends of Yelverton, Inc. v. 163rd Street Improvement Council, Inc.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1986
  3. State v. RockNew York Supreme Court · 1990

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Tiffany (NJ) Inc. v. eBay, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2008
  2. Gucci America, Inc. v. Hall & AssociatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2001
  3. L & L Wings, Inc. v. Marco-Destin, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2009
  4. Laugh Factory, Inc. v. BascianoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009
  5. National Federation of Blind, Inc. v. Loompanics Enterprises, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API