Legal Opinion
Humiston v. Stainthorp
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided March 10, 1865PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
69 U.S. 106
17 L.Ed. 905
2 Wall. 106
HUMISTON
v.
STAINTHORP.
December Term, 1864
STAINTHORP and Seguine had filed a bill in the Circuit Court for the Northern District of New York, against Humiston, for infringing a patent for moulding candles; and had obtained a decree against him.
The decree was that the complainants were entitled to a permanent injunction, and for an account of gains and profits, and that the cause be referred to a master to take and state the amount and report to the court.
A motion was now made to dismiss the cause for want of jurisdiction.
Mr. Gifford, in favor of the motion of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- WHITING v. the Bank of the United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1839
- Ray v. LawSupreme Court of the United States · 1805
- The PalmyraSupreme Court of the United States · 1825
- Brobst v. BrobstSupreme Court of the United States · 1865
- Humiston v. StainthorpSupreme Court of the United States · 1864
3Cited by29 opinions
- Marconi Wireless Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Marconi Wireless Telegraph Company of America v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- McGourkey v. Toledo & Ohio Central Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Smith v. Vulcan Iron WorksSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- In Re PottsSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.