Legal Opinion · Concurrence

A.M.S. v. M.R.C.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 28, 2013Published

1Concurrence

*837CONCURRING OPINION BY

BOWES, J.:

I join the learned majority’s decision to vacate the custody order due to the trial court’s failure to weigh all of the statutory factors that the court was mandated to consider in entering the custody award. As the majority adeptly highlighted, the trial court failed to address two factors that are particularly important under the facts of this case: 1) factor fourteen relating to the history of drug and alcohol abuse by members of Mother’s household; and 2) factor fifteen concerning the mental health conditions of members of Mother’s household.

In addition, I…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. M.J.M. v. M.L.G.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  2. In re K.T.E.L.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  3. C.B. v. J.B.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  4. M.P. v. M.P.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  5. In the Interest of R.N.F.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API