Legal Opinion

People v. Pesky

New York Court of Appeals

Decided October 24, 1930PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Per curiam

This court is a court of review, restricted in cases of this order to a pronouncement of the law, and without power to act as a trier of the facts.

If those charged with the duty to pass judgment upon the facts might say not unreasonably that the book sold by the defendant was obscene, lewd or indecent beyond a reasonable doubt (Penal Law, § 1141), we are not at liberty to substitute our judgment for theirs, or to super sede their function as the spokesmen of the thought and sentiment of the community in applying to the book complained of the standard of propriety established by the statute.

A…

2Cited by19 opinions

  1. People v. LeontiNew York Court of Appeals · 1966
  2. People v. Richmond County News, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1961
  3. People v. WendlingNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
  4. Bantam Books, Inc. v. MelkoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953
  5. Commercial Pictures Corp. v. Board of RegentsNew York Court of Appeals · 1953

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API