Propst Construction Co. v. North Carolina Department of Transportation
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Per curiam
The Court of Appeals erred in remanding this case for trial by jury. Under N.C.G.S. 136-29(c), any controversy concerning a completed contract for the construction of a state highway is to be tried by a judge without a jury. Therefore, the opinion of the Court of Appeals is modified to the extent that the controversy is remanded for trial by a judge sitting as the finder of fact. Except as modified herein, the opinion of the Court of Appeals is affirmed and adopted by this Court.
Modified and affirmed.
2Cited by2 opinions
- Equipment Finance Group, Incorporated v. R & E Electronics, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1990
- Miriam Equities, LLC v. Lb-Ubs 2007-C2 Millstream Rd., LLCNorth Carolina Business Court · 2022