Legal Opinion

Erler v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 25, 1973No. 72-992Published

1Per curiam

On the basis of our review of the briefs, record on appeal and oral argument we are of the opinion that the motion for post-conviction relief contains sufficient allegations to entitle appellant to an evidentiary hearing under Rule 3.850, FRCrP., 33 F.S. A. Blackman v. State, Fla.App.1971, 256 So.2d 18. See also Brady v. Maryland, 373 *499U.S. 83, 83 S.Ct. 1194, 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963). Cf. Fast v. State, Fla.App.1969, 221 So.2d 203; Estevez v. State, Fla.App.1968, 206 So.2d 697; Marti v. State, Fla.App.1964, 163 So.2d 506; Estrella v. State, Fla.App.1968, 215 So.2d 489; Sampson v. State,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Marti v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964
  3. Sampson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1963
  4. Fast v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1969
  5. Thomas v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1968

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API