Legal Opinion
State v. Sisler
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided September 27, 1995No. 95-CA-49PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Grady, Judge.
Defendant Jeffrey L. Sisler appeals from his conviction for a violation of R.C. 4511.19(A)(2), which prohibits operation of a motor vehicle by a person who “has a concentration of ten hundredths of one per cent or more by weight of alcohol in his blood.” The conviction was entered on a plea of no contest, which Sisler voluntarily made after the state agreed to dismiss other charges. On appeal, Sisler argues that the trial court erred when it denied his motion to suppress evidence and his motion to dismiss the charges against him on grounds of double jeopardy.
On September 9, 1994,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Rochin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Breithaupt v. AbramSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Winston v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- State v. GustafsonOhio Supreme Court · 1996
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. RavottoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2001
- State v. MayberryOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
- State v. TackettOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
- State v. CooperOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
- State v. RavottoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2001
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.