Paulino v. Rodriguez
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Defendants met their prima facie burden of establishing their entitlement to judgment as a matter of law. Defendants demonstrated that plaintiff did not suffer a serious injury to her cervical spine, lumbar spine, or left shoulder by relying on the medical reports of plaintiffs treating physician which concluded, approximately four months after the accident, that she had full ranges of motion and that the MRIs of her cervical and lumbar spine were normal (see Insurance Law § 5102 [d]; Toure v Avis Rent a Car Sys., 98 NY2d 345, 350 [2002]; Newton v Drayton, 305 AD2d 303, 304 [2003]).
In…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Toure v. Avis Rent a Car Systems, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2002
- Perl v. MeherNew York Court of Appeals · 2011
- Linton v. NawazNew York Court of Appeals · 2010
- Rubin v. SMS Taxi Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Morris v. CisseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Santos v. PerezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Jackson v. LeungAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Calcano v. RodriguezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Coley v. DeLarosaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Camacho v. EspinozaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.