Legal Opinion

Silverthorne v. Mayo

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 30, 1953No. 17PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDenny, J.

The plaintiff and the defendants concede that the partnership agreement under consideration is a valid, binding and enforceable contract as a partnership settlement. The plaintiff, however, contends the agreement is testamentary in character and void in so far as it directs that the payments provided therein shall be made to the widow of the deceased partner. Therefore, he takes the position that the balance due under the agreement must be paid to the estate of R. S. Silverthorne for distribution as provided by law and not to the executor of the last will and testament of the widow, Dorcas…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. McKinnon v. McKinnonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1893
  2. Boone v. . BooneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  3. United States v. StevensSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. Estate of HoweCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Murphy v. MurphyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. HendersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  2. Roberts v. State Tax CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Leibee v. LeibeeOregon Supreme Court · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API