Legal Opinion

Guaranty Life Insurance v. Martin

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 12, 1932No. 21739PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBroyles, C. J.

1. Under the evidence adduced upon the trial, the question whether the insured was in sound health at the date of the issuance of the policy of insurance was for determination by the jury, and their finding that he was in such health at that date (as shown by their verdict) was authorized. See, in this connection, National Life &c. Co. v. Smith, 34 Ga. App. 242 (129 S. E. 113); National Life &c. Co. v. Martin, 35 Ga. App. 1 (132 S. E. 120).

2. The insurance company’s defense to this suit was that the jpolicy never took effect, because the insured was not in sound health when the policy was…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. National Life & Accident Insurance v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1926
  2. National Life & Accident Insurance v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. ROYAL INSURANCE CO., LTD. v. CohenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
  2. American Casualty Company v. SeckingerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
  3. National Life & Accident Insurance v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
  4. National Life & Accident Insurance v. CarterCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1932
  5. National Life & Accident Insurance v. LeeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1932

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API