Legal Opinion

In the Matter of C.T.C.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 30, 1999No. 04-98-00294-CVPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Opinion by:

TOM RICKHOFF, Justice.

C.T.C. was adjudicated delinquent and committed to the Texas Youth Commission for engaging in a robbery. Upon determining that C.T.C. had voluntarily absented himself after the completion of jury selection, the trial court conducted the adjudication and disposition phases in C.T.C.’s absence. C.T.C. now argues the trial court erred in not holding a hearing to determine whether his absence was voluntary and in not considering whether it would be appropriate to delay the trial while efforts were made to locate him. We disagree and affirm.

PROCEDURAL…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Diaz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. Crosby v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Miller v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  4. Moore v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984
  5. In re J.R.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1995

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In re M.P.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2007
  2. Carl v. Long v. C. Tony Wright, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2002
  3. Hollis Grizzard, III v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2008
  4. In Re MP, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2007
  5. in the Matter of J. R., a Juvenile, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2013

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API