Legal Opinion
New Seven Colors Corp. v. White Bubble Laundromat, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 1, 2011PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*702In order for the appellant to obtain relief from her defaults in opposing the plaintiffs separate motions pursuant to CPLR 3126 to strike her answer and pursuant to CPLR 3215 (e) for leave to enter judgment against her, the appellant was required to demonstrate both a reasonable excuse for those defaults, as well as potentially meritorious opposition to the motions (see CPLR 5015 [a] [1]; L&L Auto Distribs. & Suppliers Inc. v Auto Collection, Inc., 85 AD3d 734, 735 [2011]). Here, even if the appellant preferred a reasonable excuse for her defaults, she failed to demonstrate a potentially…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- L&L Auto Distributors & Suppliers Inc. v. Auto Collection, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Codoner v. Bobby's Bus Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
3Cited by16 opinions
- Fried v. Jacob Holding, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Infante v. Breslin Realty Development Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Diederich v. WetzelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Ramirez v. Islandia Executive Plaza, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Matter of Haberman v. Zoning Bd. of Appeals of the City of Long BeachAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.