Bank of Sun Prairie v. Esser
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
1DissentDykman, J.
When courts decide to make substantial changes in the way business must be done in Wisconsin, two problems usually arise. First, the impact of the change, and its burden on ordinary business transactions is not considered, because the usual inquiry and debate of the legislative process is bypassed. *30The beliefs of a very few persons are substituted for that process. The supreme court has cautioned:
[B]efore a change in the law is made, a court, if it is to act responsibly, must be able to foresee with reasonable clarity the results of its decision and to say with reasonable certainty that the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- State v. BangertWisconsin Supreme Court · 1986
- Citizens State Bank v. Timm, Schmidt & Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
- Tucker v. MarcusWisconsin Supreme Court · 1988
- State Ex Rel. Swan v. Elections BoardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1986
- Hoven v. KelbleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.