Legal Opinion

United States v. Jordan

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided February 11, 2010No. 08-1431PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TACHA, Circuit Judge.

Mark Jordan appeals the district court’s denial of his motion for DNA testing *1266brought pursuant to the Innocence Protection Act of 2005 (“IPA”), 18 U.S.C. § 3600, as well as its denial of his motion to require the government to preserve his trial evidence. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, AFFIRM the denial of the motion for DNA testing, and DISMISS the appeal of the motion to preserve as moot.

I. BACKGROUND

The following facts are taken from this Court’s opinion affirming Mr. Jordan’s convictions, which he does not dispute.

Mr. Jordan was accused of murdering a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. Mark JordanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
  2. United States v. FasanoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. United States v. JordanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
  2. United States v. Bill WatsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  3. United States v. Shane CowleyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2016
  4. Stacey Eugene Johnson v. State of ArkansasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2019
  5. United States v. PiteraCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API