Legal Opinion

D. v. Brooks Co. v. Kinney-Shotts Inv. Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 21, 1933No. 12735PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

UATTIMORE, Justice.

The motion for rehearing is granted, our former opinion is withdrawn, and the following substituted therefor:

Appellee filed three suits in the county court, each on a note which was secured by a mortgage on an automobile, three in all, the value of which were not alleged in the petition, but the value of each automobile was alleged in the three affidavits for sequestration filed in connection with the several 'suits. One note was signed iby Mrs. Jennie Peoples, one by C. L. Bewis, 'both indorsed by appellant. These two notes aggregated $472 principal. The third note was for…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Pecos & North Texas Railway Co. v. Canyon Coal Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1909
  2. McDannell & Co. v. CherryTexas Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Cantrell v. CawyerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
  4. Leifeste v. StokesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
  5. D. v. Brooks Co. v. VeraCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kinney-Shotts Investment Co. v. D. v. Brooks Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Sun Ins. Office, Ltd. v. DunnCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API