Legal Opinion

Flintkote Company v. Grimes

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 7, 1968No. 8 Div. 285PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MERRILL, Justice.

Appellant sued appellees on a demand note which appellees had executed to appellant on October 6, 1964. Judgment was in favor of appellees, and after its motion for a new trial was overruled, appellant appealed.

Appellee, Jack F. Grimes, owned fifty-one percent of the stock in North Alabama Building Supply, Inc., a corporation, which owed appellant $17,617.80 on open account. On October 6, 1964, appellees, Jack F. Grimes and his wife, made a promissory note for the same $17,617.80 to appellant payable on demand. Thereafter, payments were made on the note reducing the principal…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Jackson v. SampleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
  2. McPherson v. EverettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1965
  3. Sweeney v. BixlerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1881
  4. National Security Insurance Company v. ElliottSupreme Court of Alabama · 1964
  5. Skipper v. Wright & ColquettAlabama Court of Appeals · 1942

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Silk v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1983
  2. Scott Paper Co. v. Novay Cherry Barge Service, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1972
  3. Engine Parts v. Citizens Bank of ClovisNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Chaffin v. HallSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
  5. Howard v. PikeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1973

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API