Legal Opinion
William T. Schmitt Associates v. Loveless
Suffolk County District Court
Decided November 26, 1984PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Lawrence Newmark, J.
This is a motion by defendant to dismiss the complaint on the ground that plaintiff failed to comply with subdivision 9 of section 130 of the General Business Law.
It appears thát in July, 1984, plaintiff moved to amend the caption of this action from “William T. Schmitt Associates, plaintiff” to “William T. Schmitt, plaintiff.” The basis for the motion was an allegation that plaintiff had inadvertently failed to file a certificate of doing business under an assumed name. In a decision dated August 14, 1984 (Honorable Martin Kerins, J., Dist Ct), the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Tri-Terminal Corp. v. CITC Industries, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
3Cited by4 opinions
- Aster Search Group v. OrthoNet New York IPA, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Graham Cook Associates v. MintzCivil Court of the City of New York · 1992
- Park Health Center v. United Financial Adjusting Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2001
- Supreme Realty Assoc. Co. v. KorovessisCivil Court of the City of New York · 1997