Monaco v. Hartz Mountain Corp.
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court 1
840 A.2d 822 (2004)
178 N.J. 401
Luigi MONACO and Francesca Monaco, his wife, Plaintiffs-Appellants and Cross-Respondents,
v.
HARTZ MOUNTAIN CORPORATION, Defendant-Respondent, and
ABC Corp., DEF Corp. and GHI Corp., (fictitious designations intended to designate unknown entities responsible for proper installation, maintenance and repair of a certain sign and/or signpost), Defendants, and
City of Newark, Defendant and Cross-Appellant.
Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Argued October 20, 2003.
Decided February 9, 2004.
Alan D. Bell, Montclair, argued the cause for appellants/cross-respondents.
Jack T.…
Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · Long; Concurrence.
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Brill v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
- Palsgraf v. Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Dolson v. AnastasiaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1969
- Hopkins v. Fox & Lazo RealtorsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
- Goldberg v. Housing Auth. of City of NewarkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1962
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.