Legal Opinion

Monaco v. Hartz Mountain Corp.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided February 9, 2004Published

1Opinion of the Court 1

840 A.2d 822 (2004)

178 N.J. 401

Luigi MONACO and Francesca Monaco, his wife, Plaintiffs-Appellants and Cross-Respondents,

v.

HARTZ MOUNTAIN CORPORATION, Defendant-Respondent, and

ABC Corp., DEF Corp. and GHI Corp., (fictitious designations intended to designate unknown entities responsible for proper installation, maintenance and repair of a certain sign and/or signpost), Defendants, and

City of Newark, Defendant and Cross-Appellant.

Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued October 20, 2003.

Decided February 9, 2004.

Alan D. Bell, Montclair, argued the cause for appellants/cross-respondents.

Jack T.…

Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · Long; Concurrence.

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Brill v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
  2. Palsgraf v. Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
  3. Dolson v. AnastasiaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1969
  4. Hopkins v. Fox & Lazo RealtorsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
  5. Goldberg v. Housing Auth. of City of NewarkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1962

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API