Cordero v. Grant

OPINION OF THE COURT

Bentley Kassal, J.

This is a motion to strike the answers of both defendants for failure to appear for an oral examination. On the call of the calendar, the motion was granted conditionally by reason of the technical default by the defendants, who had submitted *154answering papers through lawyers answering services but had not complied with the rules of this court which require that "All contested motions must be attended by counsel who shall be prepared to argue orally”. (22 NYCRR 660.8 [b] [6] [ii].)

After an order was issued on said default, it was brought to my attention…