Legal Opinion

Stork v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided February 5, 2018No. S17A1854PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

303 Ga. 21

FINAL COPY S17A1854. STORK v. THE STATE. NAHMIAS, Justice. Appellant Samuel Stork was convicted of malice murder in connection with the shooting death of Rodney Pate. In this appeal, he claims that the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction and that his trial counsel provided ineffective assistance by failing to call a witness. Neither of these claims has merit, so we affirm.1 1. (a) Viewed in the light most favorable to the verdict, the evidence presented at trial showed the following. On February 1, 2014, Pate, Adarrius Keaton, and Aquala Mobley were hanging out at…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Vega v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2009
  4. Wesley v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2010
  5. Gomez v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2017

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2022
  2. Hatney v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2020
  3. McGuire v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2019
  4. White v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2018
  5. White v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API