Legal Opinion
Humes Construction Co. v. Philadelphia Casualty Co.
Supreme Court of Rhode Island
Decided March 10, 1911PublishedCited by 31 opinions
Assumpsit.
1Opinion of the CourtSweetland, J.
This is an action of the case in assumpsit based on an employer’s liability insurance policy issued by the defendant "''to the plaintiff. The amended declaration contains three counts, together with the common counts.
On October 23, 1906, the defendant company which was engaged in the business of furnishing employers’ liability insurance issued to the plaintiff corporation, then doing business under the name of Humes, Cruise & Smiley Co., a policy of insurance, whereby the defendant agreed to indemnify the plaintiff for one year against loss from liability imposed by law upon, the assured for…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Glens Falls Portland Cement Co. v. Travelers' InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
- Tozer v. Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
- Royle Mining Co. v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1907
- Globe Navigation Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1905
- Employers' Liability Assur. Corp. v. Chicago & Big Muddy Coal & Coke Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1905
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Raymond Pendleton v. Pan American Fire and Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1963
- GODOY ETC. v. Hawaii CountyHawaii Supreme Court · 1960
- William M. Moore Construction Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guarantee Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1944
- Pabon v. Hackensack Auto Sales, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960
- Beatty v. Employers' Liability Assurance Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1933
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.