Pruitt v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Birdsong, Presiding Judge.
Harold E. Pruitt appeals his judgment of conviction of arson in the first degree. He enumerates three errors. Held:
1. Appellant contends the trial court erred in failing to consider all required statutory factors in imposing restitution. We agree. OCGA § 17-14-10 requires the ordering authority to consider the factors therein listed “[i]n determining the nature and amount of restitution,” if any, to be ordered as a condition to relief as to sentence. See Slater v. State, 209 Ga. App. 723, 725 (4) (434 SE2d 547). (Note: OCGA § 17-14-2 (5) and (6) define the terms…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Dukes v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1995
- Curtis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
- Garrett v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
- Slater v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
- Phillips v. MacDougaldCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1995
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Turner v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
- McMahon v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
- Darden v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
- In the Interest of N.T., a ChildCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2020