Legal Opinion

Pruitt v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 23, 1998No. A98A0375PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Birdsong, Presiding Judge.

Harold E. Pruitt appeals his judgment of conviction of arson in the first degree. He enumerates three errors. Held:

1. Appellant contends the trial court erred in failing to consider all required statutory factors in imposing restitution. We agree. OCGA § 17-14-10 requires the ordering authority to consider the factors therein listed “[i]n determining the nature and amount of restitution,” if any, to be ordered as a condition to relief as to sentence. See Slater v. State, 209 Ga. App. 723, 725 (4) (434 SE2d 547). (Note: OCGA § 17-14-2 (5) and (6) define the terms…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Dukes v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1995
  2. Curtis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
  3. Garrett v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
  4. Slater v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
  5. Phillips v. MacDougaldCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1995

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Turner v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
  2. McMahon v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
  3. Darden v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
  4. In the Interest of N.T., a ChildCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API