Legal Opinion

Hood Lumber Co. v. Five Points Lumber Co.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided June 7, 1952PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

The question involved on this appeal is whether or not Code Section 8746 applies to suits in the Chancery Court. The chancellor and the Court of Appeals differed in their application of the statute, and for this reason we granted certiorari.

Upon full consideration of the authorities we think the statute applies only to suits at law, and that suits to recover unliquidated damages, as in the case at bar, cannot be interposed as a cross action to a bill in equity. The Court of Appeals ’ opinion, prepared for the Court by Judge Swepston, is adopted as the' opinion of this Court. It reads as…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Stevens v. LintonTennessee Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Saranac MacH. Co. v. Nants and Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Essenkay Co. v. Essenkay Sales Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1915
  4. John Edminson v. Baxter and MorellTennessee Supreme Court · 1817

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Greenville Cabinet Co. v. HauffTennessee Supreme Court · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API