Hall v. Duplex-Power Car Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Eaton; Smith, J. Assumpsit by Eugene Hall and Clarence M. Hall, co-' partners, against the Duplex-Power Car Company for damages for fraud and breach of warranty. A judgment for defendant on a verdict directed by the court is reviewed by plaintiffs on writ of error.
1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.
The defendant is a Michigan corporation, and on November 27, 1909, was engaged in the business of manufacturing and selling automobile trucks, or motor trucks, at the city of Charlotte. The truck manufactured by the defendant is what is termed a “four-wheel drive;” that is to say, the power to drive the truck applies to all four wheels. On the day above stated the defendant entered into a contract with the plaintiff Eugene H. Hall for the manufacture and sale to him of two delivery cars and one passenger station car for the sum of $2,925. Under this contract the cars were to be delivered to…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Krause v. CookMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
- Wegner v. HerkimerMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
- Monroe v. Hickox, Mull & Hill Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1906
3Cited by6 opinions
- Haener v. McKenzieMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
- John D. Gruber Co. v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
- Youngs v. Advance-Rumely Thresher Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1921
- Potter v. ShieldsMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
- Milwaukee Tank Works v. East Jordan Co-Operative Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.