Legal Opinion

People v. Nash

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided October 26, 1979No. 78-1724PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Mejda

The State appeals pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 604(a)(1) (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1977, ch. 110A, par. 604(a)(1)) from the order which granted defendant’s motion to quash his arrest and suppress all statements and physical evidence which resulted therefrom. On appeal, the State contends that: (1) probable cause existed for defendant’s warrandess arrest; and (2) even if the arrest were made without probable cause, the statements and physical evidence were sufficientiy attenuated from the arrest to purge the initial taint. We affirm.

On July 4, 1976, Marie Gibson, while on her front porch, was killed…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Brown v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Draper v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  4. People v. ClayIllinois Supreme Court · 1973
  5. People v. RobinsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1976

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. People v. AveryAppellate Court of Illinois · 1989
  2. People v. KincyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1982
  3. People v. GrahamAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
  4. People v. StoferAppellate Court of Illinois · 1989
  5. People v. JamesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API