Legal Opinion

Southeast Aluminum Supply Corp. v. Metropolitan Dade County

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 28, 1989No. 88-328Published

1Opinion of the Court

ON REHEARING

2Per curiam

Metropolitan Dade County has filed a motion for rehearing in which it takes issue with our statement that the petitioners were found “guilty of sixteen violations of Section 10-22(e) of the Metropolitan Dade County Code....” Southeast Aluminum Supply Corp. d/b/a Signs of All Kinds v. Metropolitan Dade County, 533 So.2d 777 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988). In support thereof, the county correctly points out that (1) in addition to a violation of Section 10-22(e) of the Metropolitan Dade County Code, the charging documents also allege a violation of Section 33-86 of the Metropolitan Dade County…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lanzetta v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  2. Southeast Aluminum Supply Corp. v. Metropolitan Dade CountyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API